MicroBinfie Podcast, 83 A short journey into mobile genetic elements

Released on May 26, 2022

Discussion on Mobile Genetic Elements in Bacteria

We recently delved into the topic of mobile genetic elements in bacteria and found it quite challenging. Despite having a short discussion due to Lee losing power, we plan to return with a more comprehensive Part 2 soon.

Key Points

• Mobile Genetic Elements: These are DNA sequences that can change their position within a genome. They play a crucial role in the genetic diversity and adaptability of bacteria.

Stay tuned for our upcoming session where we will explore this topic in greater depth!

Extra notes

Key Points on Microbial Bioinformatics

• Mobile Genetic Elements (MGEs):

  • MGEs are genomic elements that can move within or between genomes, such as bacteriophages, transposons, plasmids, genomic islands, integrative conjugative elements, and integrons.
  • They exhibit diverse appearances and mechanisms for transfer, complicating their identification and characterization.
  • MGEs can be integrated in genomes without obvious signatures, making their study challenging.

• Challenges in Sequencing and Assembly:

  • Short-read Sequencing:

    • Short reads may struggle to accurately sequence regions with repeated IS elements, leading to assembly issues.
    • For example, strains like Vibrio showed complications that were resolved by long-read technologies like PacBio.
    • Short reads may not distinguish between genuine genomic events and assembly errors due to their limited range.

  • Tools and Methods:

    • Tools such as Plasmid Finder aid in identifying plasmids by finding replicon types, though they may not fully capture all plasmid-associated genes.
    • Annotation tools like Prokka are used for rough annotations, with further refinements needed for specific elements like plasmids or transposons.
    • Mapping reads back to assemblies for coverage analysis can highlight MGEs, often indicated by coverage discrepancies or GC content variations.

• CRISPR-Cas Systems:

  • CRISPR acts as a bacterial immune system targeting foreign DNA.
  • There are several tools available for CRISPR identification, such as CRISPR Finder and PileCR.

• Identification of MGEs:

  • Reliable methods to identify MGEs involve manual inspection alongside algorithmic approaches.
  • Tools like Artemis help visualize data after annotation and assembly steps, providing insights into potential MGE locations.
  • Despite automation advances, manual interpretation and the use of multiple tools are essential due to the complexity and diversity of MGEs.

• Phage Identification:

  • Programs such as FAST, PhageFind, and PhySpy apply heuristics to predict phage regions within genomes.
  • Manual validation is necessary to verify predicted results.

• Addressing Unknown Sequences:

  • When encountering unknown sequences lacking database matches, broader searches with sensitive alignment tools or domain-based predictions (e.g., InterProScan, PFAM) may be employed.
  • Understanding these sequences often requires collaboration with experimental biologists and further lab work.

• Limitations and Future Directions:

  • There is a reliance on combining computational predictions with experimental validation to fully understand and utilize information about MGEs.
  • Continual improvements in sequencing technology and bioinformatics tools are needed to resolve current challenges and improve accuracy.

This summary encapsulates insights and methodologies discussed for studying MGEs in microbial genomes, emphasizing practical challenges and the interconnected role of computational and experimental approaches in microbial bioinformatics.

Episode 83 transcript